- Wreck others then wreck yourself to get ahead
- S20 v S21 any , sensible , thoughts on
- This poor z flip
- Be among the first to play FFXIV Online on
- not to burst any bubbles but Halo MCC is
- Just tried it
- What kind of logic is that? Raytracing is still
- Sega had their name all over the original Xbox
- Long exposure shot
- Call me paranoiac but this popup came out of
- Q: What is the possible reason people buy insanely
- Why do all the best twitter accounts have android
- Poison Mushroom`s got a big heart
- An iphone charger cable, just the cable, is R499
- Persona 5 took over 3 years to hit just
- The Samsung Galaxy S21 can certainly perform, but some
- IT TOOK YOU ALL THAT LONNNNG????? HOLEY SHIIT of
- iPhone5 is better than an Android of 80k
- Every game on mobile: - I am an incompetent
- The Nemesis System patent reminds me of Layers of
- This week on your favorite video game club: Our
- From God of War to Persona 5 Royal, the
- Stolen Let yo key board expose you
- Ads in the settings screen, gross https://t
- Buddy, I don`t take no chump change as a
- If halo showed up on any other console not
- My favorite narrative right now in crypto is people
- Hey hey! It`s #selfpromosaturday what have you got going
- I used to have a higher degree of confidence
- Android users deserve to be left out of clubhouse
Music Labels Considering Pulling YouTube Videos
July 28, 2015, 2:32 pm
Record labels aren`t getting their fair slice of the pie when it comes to YouTube revenue generated by their music videos. The labels are contemplating pulling their content from the streaming service.
Monetization for the airing of streaming music and video has been a popular subject lately. Just how streaming services compensate artists and record labels for the rights to air their content has come under scrutiny. As streaming becomes even bigger business as opposed to purchasing actual digital copies of individual tracks, everyone wants a piece of the action.
Just weeks ago, the battle came to the forefront when Taylor Swift called out Apple Music on its decision not to compensate artists for streams of their music on the new service during the three-month trial period it was offering all subscribers. The pop star wrote an open letter criticizing the move and Apple soon capitulated, agreeing to pay artists for the streams during the trial, although at a reduced rate.
The debate rages on, and now it appears as if the record labels are unhappy with the lack of monetary compensation they receive from YouTube, which is owned by Google and is not only the top video streaming service in the world but also leads in music as well.
The labels are reportedly considering pulling their videos from the service altogether. "They are not serious about monetizing music on behalf of creators and, as a result, music companies are realizing they have to reset the current relationship," according to an industry source.
According to the labels, Google controls all aspects of the monetization process for content streamed on the network, and therefore they aren`t even given a breakdown on the revenue generated by the specific content they contribute.
YouTube is on a roll, with an uptick of over 60 percent in viewership last quarter and an increase in advertising. "The number of advertisers running video ads on YouTube is up more than 40 percent [compared with a year ago] and, for our top 100 advertisers, the average spend per advertiser is up over 60 percent year-over-year," said Omid Kordestani, Google`s chief business officer.
Record labels want some of that ad revenue, but if they pull their videos from the service in protest, they might wind up losing more money if people post their own videos.